Last edited by Dojora
Wednesday, July 15, 2020 | History

4 edition of Lexical archaisms in Slavic found in the catalog.

Lexical archaisms in Slavic

from Nostratic to common Slavic

by Mark Kaiser

  • 8 Want to read
  • 34 Currently reading

Published by Brockmeyer in Bochum .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Slavic languages -- Roots.,
  • Slavic languages -- Lexicology, Historical.,
  • Nostratic hypothesis.,
  • Comparative linguistics.

  • Edition Notes

    Includes bibliographical references (p. 130-151).

    Statementby Mark Kaiser ; with a preface by Vitaly Shevoroshkin.
    SeriesBochum publications in evolutionary cultural semiotics ;, BPX 26, BPX ;, 26.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsPG319.5 .K3 1990
    The Physical Object
    Paginationvi, 151 p. ;
    Number of Pages151
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL1609471M
    ISBN 103883397903
    LC Control Number91148376

    R. D. Borsley, “Introduction” R. Hudson, “Grammar without Functional Categories” R. Cann, “Functional versus Lexical: A Cognitive Dichotomy” D. Adger, “Feature Checking under Adjacency and VSO Clause Structure” R. D. Borsley and J. Kornfilt, “Mixed Extended Projections” R. Malouf, “Verbal Gerunds as Mixed Categories in HPSG” A. Warner, “English Auxiliaries . In any case, the Old Slavic words can be foundnot only in Russian, Belarusian and Ukrainian, but also in Polish, Macedonian, Bulgarian and other Slavic dialects. Therefore, discussions about which of the languages are closest to the Old Slavonic language are unlikely to .

      Similarities & Differences Between the Slavic Languages. When I wrote my book on language learning, the one with the largest lexical difference or distance is Russian. In other words Author: Steve Kaufmann. This book focuses on some of the most puzzling case marking patterns in the Slavic languages and ties this pattern to different types of aspectual phenomena. It demonstrates that the accusative versus lexical case marking contrast on an internal argument with two-place verbs is directly linked to whether the lexical/semantic aspect of a so-called ‘base’ verb is .

      The complex diachronic and synchronic status of the concepts be and have can be understood only with consideration of their full range of constructions and functions. Data from modern Slavic languages (Russian, Czech, Polish, Bulgarian) provides a window into zero copulas, non-verbal have; expressions, and verbal by: 8. Piggybacking off of Maciek Iwaniuk’s answer - the most distant Slavic language is Kashubian. It isn’t represented on this otherwise fantastic map: But if it were, it would be sticking straight up from the “POL” bubble, with about a 25% lexical distance - more difference.


Share this book
You might also like
Island of Paradise

Island of Paradise

A New Course in Urdu and Spoken Hindi for Learners in Britain

A New Course in Urdu and Spoken Hindi for Learners in Britain

Merit grants to schools based on performance

Merit grants to schools based on performance

life of Pill Garlick

life of Pill Garlick

Where children come first

Where children come first

chronicles of Gotham

chronicles of Gotham

Road to the forks

Road to the forks

Roy Lichtenstein Art Ed Books and Kit with Other and Frame (Art Ed Book and Kits)

Roy Lichtenstein Art Ed Books and Kit with Other and Frame (Art Ed Book and Kits)

Arc furnace melting in the cast metal industry

Arc furnace melting in the cast metal industry

Dualities, for two trumpets.

Dualities, for two trumpets.

Consider the lilies

Consider the lilies

Eating.

Eating.

The works of that grave and learned lawyer Judge Jenkins, prisoner in Newgate, upon divers statutes concerning the liberty and freedome of the subject, with a perfect table thereto annexed

The works of that grave and learned lawyer Judge Jenkins, prisoner in Newgate, upon divers statutes concerning the liberty and freedome of the subject, with a perfect table thereto annexed

Lexical archaisms in Slavic by Mark Kaiser Download PDF EPUB FB2

Additional Physical Format: Online version: Kaiser, Mark. Lexical archaisms in Slavic. Bochum: Brockmeyer, (OCoLC) Document Type: Book. Summary/Abstract: The paper presents the lexical archaisms selected from material collected of the linguistic research carried out at the very Grodno region inthe areas of concentration of the Polish nobility from the area of the Indura city (“szlachta zaindurska”).

These tokens non-users in modern literary Polish language, including. It is unique in combining recent insights from the field of comparative Indo-European linguistics with modern Balto-Slavic accentology.

In addition, the author makes an explicit attempt at reconstructing part of the Balto-Slavic lexicon. The entries of the dictionary are alphabetically arranged Proto-Slavic etyma. There is a group of Lexical archaisms in Slavic book with obsolete suffixes,for example, the museum (museum), promotion (assistance), fisher (fisherman).

Most often we meet lexical archaisms, for example, eye - eye, right hand - right hand, shuitsa - left hand. Like historicisms, archaisms are used tocreating a special world in fiction.

The article examines a lexical archaism meaning 'deaf' in Mazandarani (and Gilaki), fragmentary represented also in the northern area of Semnan, in Shahmirzad. It is purported to be of Eastern Iranian origin, having marginal attestations also in Classical NPers. lexicography, yet without any other occurrences in Western New : Mohammad Ghanbari.

The settlements in the Prespa region are connected with the rest of Albania only by a narrow pass between the mountains near the village of Zvezda. On the Macedonian part of the tri-border region, the larger urbanized centers include Ohrid and Struga on Lake Ohrid, Resen on Lake Prespa, and Size: 2MB.

[ ] Lexical archaisms in Modern Greek etymology T. Giannaris & n. PanTeLidis 1. introduction The aim of the present study is to examine the notion of lexical archaism in Mod- ern Greek etymology. n Greek linguistic research and literature, i lexical archaism is used with reference to lexical items that date back to older stages of the history.

Archaisms and Neologisms Identification in Texts. September Archaisms and Neologisms Identification in Texts. net of semantic and formal relations and as a special case of lexical.

Lexical archaisms are single archaic words or expressions used regularly in an affair (e.g. religion or law) or freely; literary archaism is the survival of archaic language in a traditional literary text such as a nursery rhyme or the deliberate use of a style characteristic of an earlier age—for example, in his novel The Sot-Weed Factor, John Barth writes in an 18th.

The relative frequency of equal sounds in pairs of adjacent numerals from 1 to 10 in languages of eleven language groups is a basis for calculation of linguistic distances.

: Lexical Specialization in Russian (Ucla Slavic Studies) (): Richard D. Schupbach: BooksCited by: 6. Anatoli Zhuravlyov suggested that a separate, now extinct, branch of North Slavic languages once existed, different from both South, West, and East Slavic.

The dialect formerly spoken in the vicinity of Novgorod (the Old Novgorod dialect) contains several Proto-Slavic archaisms that did not survive in any other Slavic language, and may be considered a remnant of an ancient North Slavic. archaisms represent “ traces of the old form of the texts, that escaped upon successive revisions or that were preserved in order to respect the letter and the spirit of the sacred text in accordance with tradition ” 1.

Lexical archaisms are extremely numerous in religious texts; they. Lexical archaisms are extremely numerous in religious texts; they constitute borrowings from Modern Greek or Slavonic that are no longer encountered in literary Romanian or old words, of Latin origin, retained only in certain spoken dialects, derived by means of suffixes, unprefixed etymological forms or structural calques.

Old Church Slavonic or Old Slavonic (/ s l ə ˈ v ɒ n ɪ k /, / s l æ ˈ-/), also known as Old Church Slavic, or Old Slavic (/ ˈ s l ɑː v ɪ k, ˈ s l æ v-/), was the first Slavic literary language (autonym словѣ́ньскъ ѩꙁꙑ́къ, slověnĭskŭ językŭ).It is also referred to as Paleo-Slavic (Paleoslavic) or Palaeo-Slavic (Palaeoslavic), not to be confused with ge family: Indo-European.

Focusing on Slavic languages, Danko Šipka provides a systematic approach to lexical indicators of cultural identity. In contrast to existing research, which focuses heavily on syntactic and phonological approaches, Šipka's approach is novel, more systematic and encompassing, and postulates three lexical layers of cultural identity: deep, exchange, and surface.

Historical, Indo-European, and Lexicographical Studies Lexical archaisms in the Tocharian languages Winter, Werner. 30,00 € / $ / £ Get Access to Full Text. Citation Information. Historical, Indo-European, and Lexicographical Studies.

A Festschrift for Ladislav Zgusta on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday. Edited by Hock, Hans H. Book Description Lexical Conflict combines theoretical and applied linguistic perspectives to explore the lexical richness of over world languages. The text systematises cross-linguistic and cross-cultural differences, and then formulates strategies of lexicographic treatment across these differences, building a foundation for the establishment of similar solutions in other 5/5(1).

Phraseological units containing archaic elements in bilingual lexicography in set books written in different periods and in many cases they need to consult a special (units referring to objects etc. which do not exist any longer), lexical archaisms (words which vanished although the objects etc.

they name still exist), and. Most frequently, words that fall on archaisms are being used in poetry, science andtechnology, ritual writings, geography, law, and speeches.

It is said that archaisms can be dividedinto two: the literary archaisms and the lexical archaisms. Literary archaism seeks to evoke styleof older speeches and writings. "Focusing on Slavic languages, Danko Šipka provides a systematic approach to lexical indicators of cultural identity.

In contrast to existing research, which focuses heavily on syntactic and phonological approaches, Šipka's approach is novel, more systematic and encompassing, and postulates three lexical layers of cultural identity: deep, exchange, and surface.Several South-Slavic-only lexical and morphological patterns which have been proposed have been postulated to represent common Slavic archaisms, or are shared with some Slovakian or Ukrainian dialects.

[citation needed] The South Slavic dialects form a dialectal continuum stretching from today's southern Austria to southeast phic distribution: Southeast Europe.In each one of these languages, Slavic lexical borrowings represent at least 15% of the total vocabulary.

However, Romanian has much lower influence from Slavic than Albanian or Ethnicity: Slavs.